X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |
|
Recent Comments by quantumushroom
 | comment listing type: Friends O' the Sift  Subscribe Top 15 History Sifters of All Time Top 11 History Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments         |
2009 Amnesty Bill: Another Steaming Piece of Sh*t
Keep telling yourself that QM. If all you've got is your dreams, I don't want to be the one to spoil it for you.
You won't spoil anything. The idiots have already punished themselves and the rest of America by electing a clueless community activist. It may take 20% unemployment to wake up the rest, but change is coming, my friends.
QM, how come you can't express an opinion without sophomoric name-calling?
Ask the same question over at Daily Kos and Huff Post. More perfect terms speed along the message in today's ADD environment. For example, by using "Taxocrat" instead of "Democrat" I don't have to explain every time that the Democratic solution for all problems is to raise taxes.
You're, if I'm not mistaken, among the oldest members of this site (referring to your age, not your time as a member) and yet you're also among the worst, most childish debaters.
It's not the flavor you're upset with, it's that I'm serving you something that's not on the menu. Unlike your unionized teachers, kollij proffs, goofball gangstaz, hollywood and enter-stainers like Colbertowitz, I have nothing to gain by lying to you about life and consequences, and as I like to point out from time to time, if you can present facts that prove liberal policies do anything but make life harder for a much wider swath of the population than they claim to help, I'm all ears.
And how can you seriously post a CNN clip? Aren't they the Communist News Network? Isn't everything they say a lie? Shouldn't we just ignore this as anti-American propaganda?
Dobbs--not a favorite of liberals, a proponent of lawful borders and therefore a "racist"--isn't making stuff up here like some Olbermann, he's reading off an actual proposed bill. That's what's truly frightening.
Choggie's Latest Manifesto - Via Pre Screamager
Make females swoon!
RIP THE SYSTEM with your Scrolling LED Belt Buckle.
ONLY US$29.99!
/thinkgeek
House Minority Leader John Boehner quotes the "Constitution"
Tasered In The Neck While Hands On Hood Of Car
I can't top YOUR stupid reply, but here's a bone. Thanks to liberal vermin and a warped "justice" system, this prick will probably get his payday (the lawyer will take half) he'll piss that money away in a week, and we'll all be seeing his name a few more times on the web until his stupid ass finally gets 30-year tuition at Crossbars College for armed robbery at age 24.
How wonderful it must be to live in Liberal World, where no Blacks are ever held responsible for their actions and only cops are the bad guys!
Contortionist Nadya Vasina
Dennis Kucinich Raises a Valid Point on Health Care
Even with all the inevitable Dept. of Defense waste? No. The first priority of any nation is to defend itself from invaders. If you took all the money we spend on defense, redirected it for "social services" and scrap the military, China would quickly move in. I think liberals have a tendency to forget that it's our nuke-carrying submarines circling the globe that keep monsters like China in check and everyone honest.
Unfortunately, America has no choice but to be the world's policeman, we've been cast in that role, and a Ron Paul-style return of all our Armed Forces around the world would mean absolute chaos. Think of how many rogue nations there are now, still acting like dicks WITH our military everywhere.
You won't believe this, but "spending (on national security) as a share of the national economy has actually decreased sharply in recent decades and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan brought only relatively minor increases. In 1951, with overall government spending less than half what it is today, the defense budget was nearly twice its 2009 level. (9% to 4.7%). In other words, military spending as a percentage of all governmental spending is today only one-fourth what it was sixty years ago.
"In 1968, due to Vietnam, military spending rose to 9.8%. That number (of defense spending as a percentage of GDP) came down after the conclusion of the war in Southeast Asia, and sank to a modern low of 3% under Bill Clinton, a level criticized by many military planners as irresponsibly low. Defense spending has increased steadily since then (to an estimated 4.7% this year) under the pressures of the War on Terror. The defense budget nevertheless remains historically low far below its levels under Eisenhower, say, or Kennedy, or Reagan (6%). In explaining the outrageous increase in federal, state and local spending, its obvious that defense and international entanglements had nothing to do with it."
Wood Chipper and Friends are complaining that "no one is doing anything" to help "the poor."
"A book "The Complete Idiots Guide to Economics" written in 2003 cites the U.S. Government budget as reporting that entitlements make up approximately 65 percent of our budget, distributed as follows:
Social Security: 23%
Medicare: 12%
Medicaid: 7%
Other Means-tested entitlements: 6%
Mandatory payments (pensions, etc.): 6%
Net interest on debt: 11%
In 2005, Senator Judd Gregg, then Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee stated that "Mandatory entitlement spending now represents a whopping 55 percent of all federal spending. If left on its current path, that could jump to more than 60 percent in 10 years. That will force us to cut out other necessary expenditures or raise taxes and weaken our economy." Source: The Hill newspaper, Washington DC."
Believe what you like, but there are the facts. Defense spending is a drop in the bucket compared to entitlements aka health, education, welfare. And while military tech has much improved, you don't see a doubling of quality in our govt. schools and you SURE as hell aren't going to see quantum leaps of innovation and efficiency in health care by letting the government run it.
For Kucinich & Friends we could spend 99% of the annual budget on entitlements and they would, and STILL never be happy. It's straight up fking bullsht that so many people have to have their hard-earned sht stolen by a thugverment and handed to people that don't give a sht, don't try and don't care. Yes, some of them need help, but what about the guy that can do the same as you, only he chooses to fk off? Why should you have to pay for his indolence? Do you really think it's just "the rich' getting soaked? Take a look at your paystub. The feds take a nice chuck out of your ass every week or two weeks, even if you're flipping burgers.
mootie writes At least some of that goes towards HELPING people instead of KILLING them.
We spent massive treasure and blood removing a tyrant from Iraq and giving 30 million Iraqis a chance to govern themselves. Doesn't that HELP them?
Liberalism starts with a negative premise, then gets even angrier that the impossible can't be solved with huge sums of money. It's like jumping down a hole and hanging from the bar of weights you're trying to lift while dangling.
Congressman Alan Grayson Lists Number Of Dead Per District
You're forgetting the 3 trillion spent on liberals' failed "war on poverty". Youse libs think that if only you could rob all of America's millionaires and billionaires of 90% of everything they have there'd suddenly be enough money to pay for all the socialist programs so dearly loved? That's total bunk, and even if it were true, the liberal spending spree knows no limits, with the conservative version not too far behind.
It's all a house of cards anyhoo. Obama and Douchebag Bernanke are printing money on toilet paper. Forget gold, buy canned goods and ammo!
Dennis Kucinich Raises a Valid Point on Health Care
When taxocrat FDR decided to rewrite the Constitution in the 1940s to falsely imply government may spend on anything it wanted with no restrictions, he brokered a deal with the devil. That bureaucrat-run devil appeared to bail everyone out then (altho it's more and more evident that "government help" prolonged the Depression) just as the mafia appears to provide "protection" for those it bleeds.
The devil has been running wylde for 60 years now, and the huge, tyrannical government the South feared during Civil War days is now a dangerous reality. For every liberal pissed about spending on missiles and bombs, there's a conservative pissed at 9 billion lost PER YEAR on Medicare fraud.
Put another way, a government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have, and will do so sooner than later.
A question for the Keebler Elf of Communism: if government does things more cheaply and efficiently than private enterprise, why stop with just taking over health care? Just take over everything like the soviets did. Oh, wait...
Now hating on me for revealing to you these grim truths, that the Wizard of Oz is really just a bumbling but well-meaning fool behind a curtain, is a waste of time. You don't have to believe as I do, but until you stop believing government is the Savior and start understanding job creation and defending liberty lies in those grasping things at the ends of your arms, you are screwed. WE are screwed. I raise my beer to you...
Panty Droppin' Pimp Spray
Straw Bale House made by Single Mom
Shoshanna (ex-scientologist) talks about her experiences
Obama (eventually) responds to Fort Hood Massacre
Congressman Alan Grayson Lists Number Of Dead Per District
If government does such a spectacular job of keeping industries lean, efficient and prosperous, why stop with health care? The Russian people had "free" soviet health care for 80 years. whatever happened to those guys?
Tasered In The Neck While Hands On Hood Of Car
In other news, what a fking drama queen. He ought to sell his btch-yelps to the Saw producers.
Google Navigation = Death of GPS Makers
Lock Detects Secret Knock
Johnny Depp Gives The Best Advice
Jeff Koons & Cicciolina - very NSFW
George like his chicken spicy!
rasch187
In reply to this comment by rasch187:
I could say the same about you, qm
In reply to this comment by quantumushroom:
Koons is quantum, both totally full of sht and a genius.
quantumushroom